Analysis identifies key genetic factors and interactions in acne severity, suggesting implications for genetic profiling in risk assessment.
Acne vulgaris is a multifactorial disease with high heritability, but the genetic determinants of severity remain incompletely defined. This study evaluated 650 individuals genotyped with a 60-single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel covering immune, lipid, endocrine, and barrier pathways. Acne severity was graded as 1 (n = 193), 2–3 (n = 383), or 4 (n = 74). Single-SNP analysis highlighted associations in loci such as LHCGR (rs13405728), TGF-β2 (rs1159268), FST (rs38055), WNT10A (rs74333950), PIK3R1 (rs10515088), and THADA (rs13429458) and barrier-related variants (FLG, FLG-AS1). Epistasis analysis of 44 quality-controlled SNPs revealed 190 significant interactions (false discovery rate, FDR ≤ 0.10), with TLR4 as the main hub (degree = 22), bridging immune (IL10, TNF), lipid (PNPLA3, APOE), and barrier (FLG-AS1, OVOL1) genes. Polygenic risk scoring (PRS) showed a monotonic increase across severity grades, with Grade 4 displaying higher median scores (0.319) compared to Grade 1 (−0.129) and Grades 2–3 (0.034). Discrimination was modest but consistent (AUC: 0.661 for Grade 4 vs. 1; 0.662 vs. 2–3; 0.679 vs. all others). These results support a framework where microbial sensing, lipid metabolism, and barrier function converge to drive severe acne, underscoring the potential of genetic profiling for risk stratification and precision therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Russo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: