Exploratory analysis identifies selective inhibitors for brd4's bd1/bd2 domains, suggesting implications for triple-negative breast cancer treatment.
Introduction: The study aims to explore selective potential inhibitors for the homologous BD1/BD2 domains of bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) and uncover the binding mechanisms between these inhibitors and BD1/BD2. Given BRD4's role as an epigenetic regulator and its potential in treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), overcoming the challenge of domain-specific inhibition due to the structural similarity of BD1 and BD2 is crucial. Methods: For comparison with experimental research, FL-411 was selected as a novel inhibitor for BD1/BD2. The AutoDock vina method was employed to screen potential lead compounds of BD1/BD2 from Traditional Chinese herbal medicines (TCMs) for nervous diseases. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were conducted to investigate the interaction mechanisms between BD1/BD2 and potential inhibitors (miltirone/FL-411). Results: The analysis shows that the inhibitors stabilize the conformation of BD1/BD2 and enhance their hydrophobic and salt-bridge interactions. Notably, atomic interaction studies reveal that the oxygen atom of FL-411 binds with E85 of BD1, while the 1,1-Dimethylcyclohexane group of miltirone binds with H437 of BD2, indicating the selective characteristics of these potential inhibitors. Discussion: The study reveals key structural determinants for BD1/BD2 selectivity, addressing a major challenge in BRD4-targeted drug design. MD simulations corroborate experimental data, validating the screening approach. Conclusion: Based on conformational characters of FL-411/miltirone and atomic interaction mechanism of BD1/BD2 and inhibitors, the potential inhibitors with a new skeleton and lower binding energy were generated with artificial intelligence drug discovery (AIDD) methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: