Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
$^{88}$Sr$^{+}$ optical clock reports systematic uncertainty of $7.9 imes 10^{-19}$, suggesting new benchmarks for atomic timekeeping.
We report on a ⁸⁸Sr⁺ single-ion optical clock with an estimated fractional systematic uncertainty of 7.9× 10⁻¹⁹. The low uncertainty is enabled by small rf losses, a thorough evaluation of the blackbody-radiation temperature, and our recent measurement of the differential polarizability. A detailed uncertainty evaluation is presented. We also report on two absolute frequency measurements: one against a remote cesium fountain clock and one against International Atomic Time (TAI). The former lasted 12 days and resulted in a frequency value of 444779044095485.49(15) Hz. The latter spanned ten months with monthly optical-clock uptimes between 68% and 99% and yielded a frequency value of 444779044095485.373(44) Hz. With a fractional uncertainty of 9.8× 10⁻¹⁷, it is, to our knowledge, the most accurate optical frequency measurement reported to date. Both frequency values are in agreement with other recent measurements, providing further evidence that the 2021 CIPM recommended frequency value is too high by 1.6 times its uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindvall et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: