This analysis assesses the impact of inter-sensor brightness temperature differences on snow depth algorithms, revealing notable discrepancies in sensitivity and retrieval accuracy.
Passive microwave remote sensing provides indispensable observations for constructing long-term snow depth records, which are critical for climatology, hydrology, and operational applications. Nevertheless, despite decades of snow depth monitoring, systematic evaluations of how inter-sensor brightness temperature differences (TBDs) propagate into retrieval uncertainties are still lacking. In this study, TBDs between DMSP-F18/SSMIS, FY-3D/MWRI, and AMSR2 sensors were quantified, and the sensitivity of seven snow depth retrieval algorithms to these discrepancies was systematically assessed. The results indicate that TBDs between SSMIS and AMSR2 are larger than those between MWRI and AMSR2, likely reflecting variations in sensor specifications such as frequency, observation angle, and overpass time. In terms of algorithm sensitivity, SPD, WESTDC, FY-3B, and FY-3D demonstrate less sensitivity across sensors, with standard deviations of snow depth differences generally below 2 cm. In contrast, the Foster algorithm exhibits pronounced sensitivity to TBDs, with standard deviations exceeding 11 cm and snow depth differences reaching over 20 cm in heavily forested regions (forest fracion >90%). This study provides guidance for SWE virtual constellation design and algorithm selection, supporting long-term, seamless, and consistent snow depth retrievals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: