Commentary on Lundh's (2025) Review of Psychology's Misuse of Statistics and Persistent Dismissal of its Critics.

James T. Lamiell

doi:10.17505/jpor.2025.28330

October 2, 2025Journal for Person-Oriented ResearchOpen Access

Commentary on Lundh's (2025) Review of Psychology's Misuse of Statistics and Persistent Dismissal of its Critics.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The commentary acknowledges several valid points regarding the misuse of statistics in psychology, yet it questions the reasoning behind specific critiques.
Lundh's review highlights important criticisms, but the commentary argues that some critiques may not be fully justified or sound.
The work serves as a dialogue on the ongoing disputes within the field of psychology regarding statistical practices.
It emphasizes the need for continued scrutiny of both the practices in psychology and the critiques raised by various authors.

Implication

This commentary analyzes Lundh's review of psychology's misuse of statistics, questioning some critiques and validating others.

Abstract

This document presents a commentary on Lundh’'s (2025) review of Psychology's Misuse of Statistics and Persistent Dismissal of its Critics (Lamiell, 2019). While the article acknowledges the validity of several points made by Lundh, it also questions the soundness of his critiques in a variety of respects.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

James T. Lamiell (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e02f3cf0e39f13e7fa26c9 https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2025.28330

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Commentary on Lundh's (2025) Review of Psychology's Misuse of Statistics and Persistent Dismissal of its Critics.

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Commentary on Lundh's (2025) Review of Psychology's Misuse of Statistics and Persistent Dismissal of its Critics.

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading