Cross-sectional study links digital divide to health-related quality of life, highlighting gender differences in buffering effects of digital back-feeding.
BACKGROUND The digital divide has loomed as a global public issue in recent years. However, evidence is limited regarding whether the digital divide is associated with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and whether digital back-feeding would buffer this association. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the role of digital back-feeding in the relationship between the digital divide and HRQOL among older men and women living in rural China. METHODS We used data from wave 3 of the Shandong Rural Elderly Health Cohort, conducted in 2022. A total of 3242 (n=1946, 60.02% women) rural older adults were included in the analysis. Moderating effect analysis was performed using Tobit regression models and margins plots. RESULTS A total of 71.01% (2302/3242) of the participants reported experiencing digital divide. Participants experiencing digital divide were significantly associated with lower HRQOL as measured by EQ-5D-5L scores (β=–0.020; P<.001). We found that digital back-feeding buffered the relationship between digital divide and HRQOL (β=0.024; P=.02). Furthermore, gender-stratified analyses revealed divergent moderation patterns; a significant buffering role was observed in women (β=0.031; P=.02), whereas no substantially significant moderating role emerged in men. CONCLUSIONS Our study established a significant inverse association between the digital divide and HRQOL among rural adults. Digital back-feeding emerged as a measurable protective buffer mitigating this adverse relationship. Furthermore, this buffering effect was only observed among older women. Policy implications underscore the necessity of gender-tailored digital inclusion strategies, particularly advocating for technology-proficient adult offsprings to prioritize digital engagement with their mothers in digitally marginalized rural communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Che et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: