This analysis introduces a method to quantify insurgent ideologies, revealing implications of extremism and ideology distance.
There is a widespread interest in the role of insurgent ideologies in civil war. However, the concept has been understood in a variety of ways, which are at odds with how ideology is conceptualised in political theory and election research. This results in fragmented theorising and a lack of systematic empirical insights. I argue that we should conceptualise ideology in a theoretically sound, and empirically measurable manner to enable quantitative research. Using a definition of ideology common in political science, I argue that we should reclaim the term extremism to theorise effects of insurgent ideologies. I conceptualise ideological extremity as an insurgent group's ideological distance to an average ideology. Instead of relying on ideology-specific arguments, this novel concept enables theorising and empirically studying the effect of extreme, compared to moderate ideologies in a generalisable way, allowing insights that are transferable to future ideologies. The concept maps onto a measurement model, enabling me to estimate insurgent's ideological extremity based on their manifestos.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meri Dankenbring (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: