Observational cohort study evaluates long COVID prevalence in pregnant individuals versus non-pregnant, suggesting similar risks.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the risk of long COVID among individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during pregnancy differs from that of individuals who were not pregnant at time of virus acquisition. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter observational cohort study at 79 NIH RECOVER (Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery) sites. Individuals assigned female at birth aged 18–45 years with an index (first) SARS-CoV-2 infection on or after December 1, 2021, were included. The exposure was pregnancy (any gestational age) at the time of index SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was long COVID 6 months after index infection , defined as RECOVER-Adult Long COVID Research Index score 11 or higher based on a detailed symptom survey. To account for confounding and differential selection between participants who were pregnant and not pregnant at infection, propensity score–matching methods were used to balance the groups on variables potentially associated with both pregnancy status and long COVID. RESULTS: Overall 2,423 participants were included; 580 (23.9%) were pregnant at index SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median age at infection was 33 years (interquartile range 28–38 years), and 2,131 of participants (90.0%) with known vaccination status were vaccinated. After propensity score matching, the adjusted long COVID prevalence estimates 6 months after index infection were 10.2% (95% CI, 6.2–14.3%) among those pregnant at infection and 10.6% (95% CI, 8.8–12.4%) among those not pregnant at infection. Pregnancy was not associated with a difference in adjusted risk of long COVID (adjusted risk ratio 0.96, 95% CI, 0.63–1.48). CONCLUSION: Acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy was not associated with a differential risk of long COVID at 6 months compared with similar-aged individuals who acquired SARS-CoV-2 outside of pregnancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Metz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: