Review highlights bupropion's potential as an alternative treatment for ADHD, suggesting improved symptom relief and tolerability compared to traditional stimulants.
Introduction: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders in childhood. Its core symptoms are related to executive dysfunction and include inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. As a neurodevelopmental disorder, ADHD requires chronic, long-term treatment. Therefore, it is essential to identify the most effective and safest therapeutic options that minimize the side effects of prolonged pharmacological intervention. Aim of the Study: This article examines the potential role of bupropion in ADHD treatment, focusing on its mechanism of action, efficacy in symptom alleviation, and possible side effects. Materials and Methods: This review was conducted using multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The search terms used were: “ADHD”, “bupropion”, “methylphenidate”, “comorbidity”, “side effects”, and “non-stimulants”. Summary of Current Knowledge: ADHD should be managed with both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods. While methylphenidate is considered first-line pharmacological treatment, it is associated with a relatively high discontinuation rate. Bupropion, as an alternative, may offer effective symptom relief and better tolerability in patients who experience severe side effects from stimulant medications. Conclusions: Bupropion appears to be effective in treating ADHD compared to placebo and is generally well tolerated, especially in contrast to first-line stimulant treatments. It may be a viable alternative for patients who do not tolerate stimulants. However, further research using objective comparative methods is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and side effect profiles of bupropion versus methylphenidate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narożniak et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: