Manual and automated radiolabeling methods for lutetium-177 showed different radiochemical purities, highlighting the impact of antioxidant concentration.
The growing use of experimental radiopharmaceuticals for targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) highlights the need for robust “in house” radiolabeling protocols. Among these, PSMA-ALB-56 is a PSMA ligand incorporating an albumin-binding moiety to enhance pharmacokinetics, which showed promise for prostate cancer treatment. This study investigated manual radiolabeling conditions of this vector molecule with lutetium-177 and developed a corresponding automated synthesis protocol. Manual experiments on low activities explored buffer systems and antioxidants, identifying sodium acetate buffer and L-methionine as optimal, achieving radiochemical purities above 97% with excellent stability over 48 h. However, when these conditions were transposed directly to an automated process on a GAIA® module with activities > 2 GBq, radiochemical purity dropped below 70% due to significant radiolysis. This result emphasized that conditions optimized at low activities are not directly transferable to high-activity automated production, and highlighted the crucial role of antioxidant concentration. An optimized automated method was subsequently developed, integrating a solid-phase extraction purification step, higher antioxidant levels during radiolabeling and formulation, and a larger final product volume. These changes led to radiochemical purities above 98.9% and excellent product stability over 120 h for 3 test batches. The presence of high concentrations of methionine and ascorbic acid was essential to protect against radiolysis. This work underscores the importance of adjusting radiolabeling strategies during process scale-up and confirmed that antioxidant concentration is essential for successful 177Lu radiolabeling. The optimized automated method developed here for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-ALB-56 may also be adapted to other radiopharmaceuticals in development for TRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vanney et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: