Mixed-methods approach developed and validated an attachment questionnaire for mothers, indicating strong psychometric properties.
Secure attachment relationships provide the foundation for lifelong emotional resilience and social flourishing. However, measuring attachment with observational methods is challenging at scale in low-resource settings. Caregiver-report questionnaires offer a feasible alternative but remain underutilized and insufficiently validated for Majority World contexts. This study aimed to address this gap by culturally adapting and validating the Attachment Relationship Inventory-Caregiver Perception 2–5 years Short Form Peru (ARI-SF-Peru) questionnaire for use in an Andean setting. Using a stepwise mixed-methods design, we employed qualitative methods to refine the questionnaire, followed by confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) to test its psychometric properties in a validation sample of N = 1,000 mothers. A simplified two-factor model (secure vs. insecure attachment) demonstrated strong reliability and predictive validity for child outcomes, though a four-factor model with all attachment styles can be used to provide additional theoretical insights. The final 21-item questionnaire provides a practical, culturally adapted, and valid tool for assessing mothers’ perceptions of their attachment relationships with their young children in an understudied population. The study also provides a framework for adapting self-report assessments in similar contexts, recommending simplified language, positive phrasing, and reduced response options to enhance clarity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jäggi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: