Observational study reveals elevated [OIII]/[CII] ratios in galaxies at redshift >6, suggesting burstiness impacts star formation.
We present new ALMA [OIII]₈₈ observations of eight previously [CII]₁₅₈-detected galaxies at 6.8 z 7.7. Six of our targets -- the primary sample -- are massive, UV-luminous galaxies drawn from the REBELS survey, while the remaining two are UV-fainter galaxies that were previously serendipitously detected through their luminous [CII] lines in the REBELS fields. We detect [OIII]₈₈ emission in all eight galaxies at $6.2 - 17.7σ$ significance, and find them to be consistent with the local dwarf galaxy relation between L_[OIII] and star formation rate. Our sample spans [OIII]/[CII] ≈ 1.9 - 9.6, which is typical for the high-redshift galaxy population. Five of the primary targets benefit from JWST/NIRSpec observations, enabling a direct comparison of the [OIII]/[CII] ratio against rest-optical ISM diagnostics. We supplement our high-redshift sample with eleven z≈6-14 galaxies in the literature for which similar ALMA and JWST observations are available, and furthermore compare to the [OIII]/[CII] ratios measured for local dwarf galaxies. We find that, at fixed metallicity and ionization parameter, $z>6$ galaxies show elevated [OIII]/[CII] ratios compared to local dwarfs. Instead, we find that a large [OIII]4959,5007+H$β$ equivalent width -- a proxy for burstiness -- is the main driver of the high [OIII]/[CII] ratios seen in the early Universe, which is primarily due to [CII] being suppressed in bursty galaxies. Given the apparent validity of the [OIII]₈₈-SFR relation across most of cosmic time, as well as the abundance of young, bursty galaxies at high redshift, [OIII]₈₈ is set to remain a powerful ISM tracer at the cosmic dawn.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Algera et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: