Commentary highlights interventions to recognize cognitive bias and noise in clinical reasoning, suggesting practical applications.
Dear Editor, We read with great interest the recent commentary by Ng et al.1 and commend the authors for their timely and thoughtful synthesis of key concepts in clinical reasoning, especially their articulation of cognitive bias and noise as distinct yet intertwined contributors to decision variability. Their proposals for workplace and pedagogical interventions are both practical and mostly grounded in contemporary literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mucheli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: