This analysis reveals positive associations between growth mindsets and social-emotional skills, suggesting potential intervention strategies.
Background Growth mindsets refer to the belief that personal attributes can be developed and improved through learning and effort. Much of the prior work on mindsets has focused on mindsets of intelligence, with little attention devoted to whether and how growth mindsets might also be relevant to the domain of social–emotional skills. Aims To address this gap, this study aimed to extend research on growth mindsets to the domain of social–emotional skills and examine the associations between growth mindsets and various types of social–emotional skills. We explored five broad social–emotional skills and 15 specific facet‐level skills, including task performance (self‐control, responsibility, persistence), emotional regulation (stress resistance, emotional control, optimism), engaging with others (energy, assertiveness, sociability), collaboration (empathy, cooperation, trust) and open mindedness (curiosity, creativity, tolerance). Sample We drew on data from 29,798 fifteen‐year‐old students from 10 cities across nine countries. Methods Hierarchical linear modelling was employed to investigate the association between growth mindsets and various types of social–emotional skills. Results Results indicated that a growth mindset of social–emotional skills was positively associated with five broad social–emotional skills: task performance, emotional regulation, engaging with others, collaboration, and open‐mindedness. These results also applied to the 15 specific facet‐level skills. Interestingly, we also found that mindsets of social–emotional skills were most strongly associated with emotional regulation. Conclusion This study extended the growth mindset literature by applying it to the domain of social–emotional skills. Our findings may have promising implications for future interventions aimed at improving students' social–emotional skills.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: