Empirical assessment reveals combined defense strategies mitigate model inversion attacks in tabular data, suggesting effective guidelines for compliance with privacy laws.
As more machine learning models are used in sensitive fields like healthcare, finance, and smart infrastructure, protecting structured tabular data from privacy attacks is a key research challenge. Although several privacy-preserving methods have been proposed for tabular data, a comprehensive comparison of their performance and trade-offs has yet to be conducted. We introduce and empirically assess a combined defense system that integrates differential privacy, federated learning, adaptive noise injection, hybrid cryptographic encryption, and ensemble-based obfuscation. The given strategies are analyzed on the benchmark tabular datasets (ADULT, GSS, FTE), showing that the suggested methods can mitigate up to 50 percent of model inversion attacks in relation to baseline models without decreasing the model utility (F1 scores are higher than 0.85). Moreover, on these datasets, our results match or exceed the latest state-of-the-art (SOTA) in terms of privacy. We also transform each defense into essential data privacy laws worldwide (GDPR and HIPAA), suggesting the best applicable guidelines for the ethical and regulation-sensitive deployment of privacy-preserving machine learning models in sensitive spaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vijayan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: