This analysis reveals age and spherical equivalent correlations with ocular aberrations in Koreans, suggesting significant interocular symmetry.
Background/Objectives: Ocular wavefront aberrations are clinically relevant for optimizing vision correction and predicting surgical outcomes. This study aimed to establish normative reference ranges for a Korean population by quantifying wavefront aberrations using a Hartmann–Shack wavefront sensor and Zernike coefficients, and to assess correlations with age, sex, and spherical equivalent (SE). Methods: Wavefront aberrations were measured in 98 Koreans (196 eyes) using a Hartmann–Shack aberrometer without cycloplegia. Five repeated measurements per eye at a 6 mm pupil size were averaged. Parameters included Zernike coefficients (Z3–Z20), higher-order aberration (HOA) root mean square (RMS, Z6–Z20), and total RMS (Z3–Z20). Associations with age, sex, and SE were assessed using univariable and multivariable linear mixed-effects models. Second-order polynomial regression assessed nonlinear relationships. Interocular symmetry was evaluated using mirror-symmetry-adjusted Spearman’s correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Vertical coma (Z7, 0.208 ± 0.174 μm) and spherical aberration (Z12, 0.200 ± 0.161 μm) were the largest contributors to HOA RMS. Mean HOA RMS and total RMS were 0.51 ± 0.21 μm and 3.03 ± 2.51 μm, respectively. HOA RMS increased with age (β = 0.003 μm/year, p = 0.010), whereas total RMS decreased with SE (β = −0.678 μm/D, p < 0.001). Most Zernike coefficients showed positive interocular correlations, with ICCs of 0.75 for total RMS and 0.64 for HOA RMS. Conclusions: In normal Korean eyes, HOAs increased with age and exhibited significant interocular symmetry. Vertical coma and spherical aberration were predominant components. While the pattern was similar to that in Western populations, the absolute values were greater. These normative values may aid future wavefront-guided refractive surgery and presbyopia correction procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: