Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study predicts hemorrhage in biopsy patients, highlighting nomogram's clinical utility.
BACKGROUND Stereotactic biopsy, while essential for intracranial tumor diagnosis, carries 5%-20% hemorrhage risk, with 10%-30% requiring surgical evacuation. Existing models using coagulation or tumor size lack clinical utility due to complexity (≥12 variables) or poor discrimination (AUC<0.75). We developed a simplified predictive tool using routine preoperative data. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study analyzed 69 biopsy patients (2023-2024) from a tertiary center, divided into derivation (n=48) and validation (n=21) cohorts. The primary outcome was radiologically confirmed hemorrhage (≥1 cm³) within 24h; secondary outcomes included surgical evacuation for hematomas ≥30 mL or neurological decline. We assessed 37 variables, including demographics, tumor characteristics (depth, diameter), and hematologic profiles. Analysis involved random forest preselection (top 20% variables), multivariable logistic regression (backward elimination, p<0.10), and nomogram development with 1,000 bootstrap validations. Performance was evaluated using ROC-AUC, Brier score, and decision curve analysis (5-40% thresholds). RESULTS The hemorrhage incidence was 35.4% (17/48) in the derivation cohort versus 47.6% (10/21) in the validation cohort, respectively. The final predictive model included six significant variables: serum chloride (OR=0.82), urea (OR=1.14, eosinophils (OR=1.28), albumin (OR=0.96), platelet width (OR=3.64), and deep-seated tumor location (OR=1.27). The model demonstrated strong discrimination in validation (AUC=0.83), outperforming conventional models by ΔAUC +0.18 (P<0.001). It showed good calibration (Brier score=0.12) and clinical utility at risk thresholds above 41%. CONCLUSION This validated nomogram enables hemorrhage risk stratification using six preoperative parameters. Correcting modifiable factors (e.g., electrolytes) and vigilance in deep-seated tumors may reduce reoperations. Multicenter validation is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: