Randomized experiment identifies endowment effect as key driver in default nudges, suggesting new policy implications.
Default nudges are widely used and effective, but their mechanisms remain unclear. We test whether ease, endowment, or endorsement effects drive choices. In an online randomized experiment, the endowment channel emerges as the driver. We then use a novel fMRI approach that constructs brain activity maps of cognitions and uses them to trace their variation in each cognition during decision-making. Our approach validates treatments by confirming they elicit the intended cognitions and uses them as instruments to identify the causal effect of cognition on choice. Results are consistent with endowment driving default nudge effectiveness, suggesting policy designs should leverage it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chikazoe et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: