Quantitative research shows a strong link between social media use and patriotism in Malaysian youth, suggesting the need for strategic engagement.
Patriotism serves as a foundation for strengthening national identity, promoting civic responsibility, and fostering social cohesion, particularly among young people in today’s digitally connected society. This study investigates the relationship between social media usage and patriotic sentiment among Malaysian youth, using Media Dependence Theory and Structural Functionalism Theory as conceptual frameworks. As digital platforms increasingly serve as primary sources of information, understanding their role in shaping patriotic attitudes is crucial for effective national integration strategies. A quantitative research design was employed, involving 400 respondents from diverse ethnic, gender, and age groups across Malaysia. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including Pearson correlation tests via SPSS. Findings revealed a strong and statistically significant positive correlation between social media usage and levels of patriotism (r = 0.878, p < 0.001). TikTok was the most influential platform, followed by Instagram and WhatsApp, underscoring the effectiveness of short-form, interactive content in enhancing national pride and youth engagement. The study identifies opportunities for patriotic engagement through digital storytelling, cultural campaigns, and interactive historical content. However, it also highlights key challenges such as misinformation, digital illiteracy, and performative nationalism, which may undermine genuine patriotic sentiment. This research examines how social media can be strategically leveraged to cultivate genuine patriotism. It calls for collaboration among policymakers, educators, influencers, and content creators to strengthen digital literacy and promote responsible, inclusive content. In doing so, social media can function not only as a communication tool but also as an agent of socialization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: