Meta-analysis shows rTMS improves cognitive outcomes in psychiatric and neurological conditions, suggesting clinical utility.
BACKGROUND Cognitive deficits are common across numerous neurological and psychiatric conditions, including patients with brain tumors. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique; however, its efficacy for improving cognitive functioning remains to be established. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of rTMS in enhancing cognitive functioning through a meta-analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS A PRISMA systematic search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing active versus sham (placebo) rTMS, with cognitive outcomes reported as either primary or secondary endpoints in individuals with psychiatric/neurological conditions or healthy volunteers. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the effect sizes of rTMS on global cognition, cognitive screeners (MMSE/MoCA) and specific cognitive domains, including attention, memory, information processing speed, working memory, executive function, language, and social cognition. RESULTS A total of 108 studies were included, comprising 4265 participants (2173 active, 2092 sham). Active rTMS was associated with a statistically significant improvement in overall cognitive functioning compared to sham, with a pooled effect size of Hedges’ g = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.22-0.31). Significant cognitive improvements were observed across all domains, with small-to-moderate effect sizes (Hedges’g range: 0.15-0.79). The strongest evidence for beneficial effects of rTMS was found for executive functioning (g = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07-0.24), language (g = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.27-0.44), and memory functioning (g = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.18-0.40). However, substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes was observed across studies (I²= 10.3-92.6%), indicating that a proportion of the variability in results is likely due to differences in study populations, treatment protocols, or cognitive outcomes. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis supports the transdiagnostic efficacy of rTMS for cognitive improvement, with small to moderate effects observed across a broad spectrum of populations and cognitive domains. These findings highlight the clinical utility of rTMS as a cognitive intervention - potentially also in brain tumor patients, for whom preliminary studies to this effect are underway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: