Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study examines methotrexate's reduced dosage impact on survival in pediatric medulloblastoma, suggesting safety in resource-limited settings.
BACKGROUND Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children, accounting for 20-25% of all pediatric brain tumors. Patients are classified into two prognostic groups. The standard-risk group includes children older than 3 years, with no distant metastases (Chang stage M0), and with minimal residual tumor (<1.5 cm²) after surgery. The high-risk group includes patients under 3 years of age, those with metastatic disease, or those who underwent only partial tumor resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 2012 and 2022, a total of 50 children were treated for medulloblastoma, with a mean age of 12 years. All patients were treated according to the HIT-2000, HIT-2014, and HIT-2020 protocols. Children in the high-risk group received 8 cycles of induction chemotherapy (using carboplatin, etoposide, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and high-dose methotrexate at a reduced dose of 1 g/m², instead of the standard 5 g/m²). This was followed by craniospinal radiotherapy (25-30 Gy to the entire CNS with an additional boost to the posterior fossa) and 4 courses of maintenance chemotherapy according to the Parkers protocol (cisplatin, lomustine, and vincristine). RESULTS Most patients tolerated chemotherapy and radiotherapy satisfactorily. Among high-risk patients, 7 experienced recurrence (4 during treatment), and 7 children died. The 10-year event-free survival rate was 56%, which is comparable to international outcomes. Importantly, the reduced methotrexate dose of 1 g/m² did not result in decreased survival. CONCLUSION Our experience suggests that using methotrexate at a reduced dose of 1 g/m² instead of the standard 5 g/m² does not compromise survival in high-risk medulloblastoma patients. This supports the conclusion that the routine use of high-dose methotrexate (5 g/m²) may not be justified, especially considering its toxicity and limited resource settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mammadova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: