Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The analysis demonstrates that joins of closed sublocales do not always form a coframe, indicating complexities in point-free topology.
Given a locale L, the collection Sc(L) of joins of closed sublocales forms a frame--somewhat unexpectedly, as it is naturally embedded in the coframe of all sublocales of L, where by coframe we mean the order-theoretic dual of a frame. This construction has attracted attention in point-free topology: as a maximal essential extension in the category of frames, for its (non-)functorial properties, its relation to canonical extensions and exact filters of frames, etc. A central open question of the theory, posed by Picado, Pultr, and Tozzi in 2019, asked whether Sc(L) is always a coframe, or whether there exists a locale for which this fails. In this paper, we resolve this question in the negative by constructing a locale L such that Sc(L) is not a coframe. The main challenge in such questions lies in the difficulty of understanding exact infima in Sc(L); we circumvent this by analysing a certain separation property satisfied by Sc(L).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Igor Arrieta (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: