Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis demonstrates the noise sensitivity of the signed Wasserstein distance in images, revealing implications for cryo-electron microscopy.
Wasserstein metrics are increasingly being used as similarity scores for images treated as discrete measures on a grid, yet their behavior under noise remains poorly understood. In this work, we consider the sensitivity of the signed Wasserstein distance with respect to pixel-wise additive noise and derive non-asymptotic upper bounds. Among other results, we prove that the error in the signed 2-Wasserstein distance scales with the square root of the noise standard deviation, whereas the Euclidean norm scales linearly. We present experiments that support our theoretical findings and point to a peculiar phenomenon where increasing the level of noise can decrease the Wasserstein distance. A case study on cryo-electron microscopy images demonstrates that the Wasserstein metric can preserve the geometric structure even when the Euclidean metric fails to do so.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lager et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: