Cross-sectional study reveals elevated EBV exposure and complement C3 levels in immunocompromised patients, suggesting impaired immune responses.
This cross-sectional study (4 Oct 2024–5Mar 2025) assessed Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seroprevalence and complement activity in 100 immunocompromised patients (80 cancers and 20 kidney transplant) versus 50 healthy blood donors at Baqubah Teaching Hospital. Serum IgG/IgM antibodies were quantified by ELISA, alongside hematologic indices and complement components C3 and C4. EBV exposure was substantially higher in the patient group: 17% were IgG-positive and 4% IgM-positive, compared with only 3% IgG-positivity and 0% IgM-positivity in controls, underscoring greater past and recent infection in immunocompromised hosts. Hematologic profiles reflected this vulnerability. Patients exhibited significantly lower haemoglobin (11.57 ± 0.19 g/dL vs. 12.75 ± 0.16 g/dL; p = 0.001) and lymphocyte counts (1.54 ± 0.07 × 10³ µL⁻¹ vs. 1.89 ± 0.13 × 10³ µL⁻¹; p = 0.02), alongside markedly depressed total white blood cell counts (4.90 ± 0.18 × 10³ µL⁻¹ vs. 9.90 ± 0.29 × 10³ µL⁻¹; p = 0.001). Red blood cell counts were paradoxically higher in patients (4.11 ± 0.10 × 10⁶ µL⁻¹ vs. 3.65 ± 0.10 × 10⁶ µL⁻¹; p = 0.001), while platelet numbers did not differ. Complement analysis revealed a pronounced rise in C3 among patients (116.68 ± 2.17 mg/dL) relative to controls (91.26 ± 3.63 mg/dL; p = 0.001), suggesting enhanced innate immune activation; C4 levels remained comparable (31.46 ± 0.89 mg/dL vs. 31.27 ± 1.11 mg/dL; p = 0.801). In conclusion, the data highlight a significantly greater EBV burden in tumour and transplant recipients, accompanied by characteristic shifts in blood counts and elevated C3.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibrahim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: