Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This case study demonstrates cost reduction through value engineering in a housing project, suggesting effective planning methods.
Cost efficiency in small-scale housing projects remains a critical challenge in construction planning. This study introduces a novel integrative approach by combining a precision-based Pareto analysis with a multidimensional Value Index evaluation within the framework of Value Engineering (VE). A case study was conducted on a residential project by CV. Majas in Banjarmasin. Three dominant cost items—wall, concrete, and woodwork—were identified using a quantitative ΔC and ΔP formula, marking an advancement over conventional Pareto analysis. Alternative evaluations were based on five functional criteria: strength, weather resistance, aesthetics, ease of installation, and maintenance. Results indicate that VE implementation reduced total project costs by 3.08% without compromising quality or functionality. The most efficient alternatives included lightweight concrete blocks, ready-mix concrete K-225, and meranti wood. The key novelty lies in the measurable and function-oriented cost optimization model that combines quantitative cost classification with functional scoring, providing a more objective and applicable decision-making tool in construction cost management. These findings contribute to the development of more rational and replicable cost planning strategies for similar residential projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhammad Hazairin (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: