Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis demonstrates how small working groups enhance forest management decisions by negotiating tradeoffs among conflicting goals.
Diverse interest groups, often with conflicting goals, are demanding voices in setting the goals of land management. If goals are to reflect informed opinion, compromise and opportunities for mutual advantage, managers and conflicting interest groups must interact sufficiently to identify tradeoffs. Small working groups, with sustained interaction among representatives of conflicting interests, offer a solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagar et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: