Background Although advances in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) research have provided a new treatment approach for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, their survival is still unsatisfactory, and there are issues in the era of response prediction to immunotherapy. Methods Using bioinformatics methods, a prognostic signature was constructed, and its predictive ability was validated both in the internal and external datasets (GSE68465). We also explored the tumor-infiltrating immune cells, mutation profiles, and immunophenoscore (IPS) in the low-and high-risk groups. Results As far as we are aware, this is the first study which introduces a novel prognostic signature model using BIRC5, CBLC, S100P, SHC3, ANOS1, VIPR1, LGR4, PGC, and IGKV4.1. According to multivariate analysis, the 9-immune-related genes (IRGs) signature provided an independent prognostic factor for the overall survival (OS). The low-risk group had better OS, and the tumor mutation burden (TMB) was significantly lower in this group. Moreover, the risk scores were negatively associated with the tumor-infiltrating immune cells, like CD8 + T cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, and NK cells. In addition, the IPS were significantly higher in the low-risk group as they had higher gene expression of immune checkpoints, suggesting that ICIs could be a promising treatment option for low-risk LUAD patients. Conclusion The combination of these 9-IRGs not only could efficiently predict overall survival of LUAD patients but also show a powerful association with the expression of immune checkpoints and response to ICIs based on IPS; hoping this model paves the way for better stratification and management of patients in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davoodi‐Moghaddam et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: