This paper addresses both semantic issues of countability in linguistics, and philosophical issues arising from the problem of the many. I argue (i) that the problem of the many is orthogonal to vagueness and we should look to the semantics of count nouns and numerals for its solution; (ii) that the problem of the many is a challenge for contemporary mereological analyses of count nouns in semantics; but (iii) that the count criterion in these theories can be weakened to avoid the problem. Specifically, weak quantization is proposed as the criterion: a sum, x , counts as n P s if and only if x has n disjoint parts, each of which is in the extension of P , but where the sum of no two of them is also in the extension of P . I show how importing this idea into the semantics of numerals provides a semantic means of dissolving the paradox.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Roger Sutton (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: