⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

October 4, 2024Translational Vision Science & TechnologyOpen Access

In Vivo Femtosecond Laser Machined Transepithelial Nonlinear Optical Corneal Crosslinking Compared to Ultraviolet Corneal Crosslinking

Samantha Bradford Rohan P. Joshi Shangbang Luo Emily Farrah Yilu Xie Donald D. Brown Tibor Juhász James V. Jester

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

This study assessed the safety and efficacy of transepithelial crosslinking (CXL) using femtosecond (FS) laser-machined epithelial microchannels (MCs) followed by UVA CXL compared to FS laser (NLO CXL) in rabbits.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Bradford et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e55c90e2b3180350efa3d3 https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.13.10.9

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Comparative studies on UVA and femtosecond corneal crosslinking characterized using Brillouin microscopy2024
2Nonlinear Optical Corneal Crosslinking, Mechanical Stiffening, and Corneal Flattening Using Amplified Femtosecond PulsesOriginal Research · 2019 · 19 citations
3Efficacy and safety of combined <scp>UV</scp>‐light corneal crosslinking and fine‐needle diathermy to regress pathological murine corneal (lymph)angiogenesis in vivo2024 · 3 citations
4Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Corneal cross-Linking in Progressive Keratoconus: Epithelium on With Supplemental Oxygen Versus Epithelium off ProtocolOriginal Research · 2026
5Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Current Knowledge and Practice and Future TrendsOriginal Research · 2020 · 28 citations