Problems of acts of cyber-terrorism in the conditions of martial law

Every modern socially active person in Ukraine uses mobile devices and has access to the Internet, state institutions have switched to electronic document management, the stable operation of the banking sector, railways, air transport and large companies depends on the stability of the cyberspace in which they work and rely on communication using electronic means. In the conditions of martial law, the activities of state authorities and local self-government bodies are reduced to assisting the governing bodies created in individual regions in the direct performance of national defense tasks. In the system of state authorities operating under martial law, internal affairs bodies occupy a special place due to the nature of the tasks they perform under these operational conditions. Effectiveness of internal affairs bodies is vital for the direct provision of internal security. It is for this purpose that it is necessary to clearly define the competence of internal affairs bodies. After all, only the presence of certain powers ensures compliance with legality in the performance of functions by services and divisions of internal affairs bodies. Of course, for the successful implementation of the tasks assigned to the Ministry of Internal Affairs under martial law, the duties and rights of the Ministry of Internal Affairs must correspond to the basic principle that new duties correspond to new rights. It is very important to include in the system of coercive measures the expansion of the powers of internal affairs bodies during the introduction of martial law. Internal security officers cannot go beyond the permitted methods and means of carrying out security operations. In our opinion, the scope of powers of the employee of internal affairs bodies in such cases should be expanded. The complexity of the powers of the Ministry of Internal Affairs is reflected in the internal management of various institutions. The legislation of Ukraine on criminal responsibility, which was developed for the needs of peacetime, turned out to be insufficiently effective in the field of combating crime in the situation of armed aggression of the Russian Federation. Such a situation necessitated the urgent adaptation of the legislation of Ukraine to the conditions of martial law.