The objective of our study was to compare complications of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), in ischemic stroke (IS) patients admitted with or without COVID-19 to hospitals converted to deliver COVID-19-specific care. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of 817 clinical cases of IS patients aged 25–99 years treated in regional vascular centers of Saint Petersburg from 1 January to 31 December 2021, with confirmed thrombotic occlusion of cerebral vessels and subsequent EVT intervention. Results. The EVT number per bed was significantly higher (1.6) in the non-converted hospitals compared to the COVID-19-converted hospitals (0.49; p 0.001). At the same time, more intraoperative complications (12% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.03) were reported in non-converted hospitals compared to COVID-19 converted hospitals. The likelihood of a favorable functional outcome was higher in younger patients with less severe neurological deficits on admission and without concomitant COVID-19 or post-operative complications. Conclusion. COVID-19 is a limiting factor for the effectiveness of an IS treatment in patients who underwent EVT, affecting thereby functional outcomes in this cohort of patients. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intra-operative EVT complication rate was associated with disrupted triage of IS patients and an uneven distribution of the workload among surgical teams in the city hospitals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yakovlev et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: