An experiment was conducted at Vegetable Farm, Department of Vegetable Science, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Jhalawar (Rajasthan) during rabi season of 2021-2022 pea.The experiment consisted thirteen treatments of organic growth promoters viz. Panchagavya @ 2%, Panchagavya @ 4%,Panchagavya @ 6%, Jeevamrut @ 2%,Jeevamrut @ 4%, Jeevamrut @ 6% and Brahmastra @ 2%, Brahmastra @ 4%, Brahmastra @ 6% and vermiwash @ 5%, vermiwash @10%, vermiwash @15% and Control) and laid out in randomized block design with three replications. Results revealed that the foliar spray of Panchagavya @ 4% was recorded higher chlorophyll content (2.81 mg/100g) in leaves over different growth promotors and control but it was found at par with the application of Panchagavya @ 4% , Vermiwash @ 5%,Vermiwash @ 10%, Vermiwash @ 15%,Jeevamrut @ 4%and Brahmastra @ 6% in pea. Significantly higher crude protein content (24.97%),ascorbic acid content (27.52 mg/100 g) and TSS content 19.0 ˚Brix were recorded with foliar application of Vermiwash @ 10% over control, Vermiwash @ 5%, Jeevamrut@2%, Jeevamrut @ 4%, Brahmastra @ 2%, Brahmastra @ 4% in pea. However, it was found at par with application of Panchagavya@ 2%, Panchagavya@ 4%, Panchagavya@ 6%, Vermiwash@ 10%, Vermiwash @ 15%, Jeevamrut @ 6% and Brahmastra @ 6% in the pea. Results revealed that under foliar spray of Vermiwash @ 15% (157.34 q/ha) and lowest was found in under control (118.76 q/ha), but it was found at par with application of Panchagavya@ 4%, Panchagavya @ 6%, Vermiwash @ 10%, Jeevamrut @ 4%, Jeevamrut @ 6%, Brahmastra @ 4% and Brahmastra @ 4% yield of pea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yadav et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: