Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract. Ice-core water isotopes contain valuable information on past climate changes. However, such information can be altered by post-depositional processing after snow deposition. Atmosphere–snow water vapor exchange is one such process, but its influence remains poorly constrained. Here we constructed a box model to quantify the atmosphere–snow water vapor exchange fluxes and the associated isotope effects at sites with low snow accumulation rates, where the effects of atmosphere–snow water vapor exchange are suspected to be large. The model reproduced the observed diurnal variations in δ18O, δD, and deuterium excess (d-excess) in water vapor at Dome C, East Antarctica. According to the same model framework, we found that under average summer clear-sky conditions, atmosphere–snow water vapor exchange at Dome A can cause diurnal variations in atmospheric water vapor δ18O and δD of 4.8 ‰ ± 2.6 ‰ and 29 ‰ ± 19 ‰, with corresponding diurnal variations in surface snow δ18O and δD of 0.80 ‰ ± 0.35 ‰ and 1.6 ‰ ± 2.7 ‰. The modeled results under summer cloudy conditions display similar patterns to those under clear-sky conditions but with much smaller magnitudes of diurnal variations. However, under winter conditions at Dome A, the model predicts few to no diurnal changes in snow isotopes, consistent with the stable boundary condition in winter that inhibits effective vapor exchange between the atmosphere and snow. In addition, after 24 h and continuous simulations of 11 d, the model predicts significant enrichments in snow isotopes under summer conditions, while in winter, the depletions also accumulate after each 24 h simulation but with a much smaller magnitude of change compared to the results from summer simulations. If the modeled snow isotope enrichments in summer conditions and the depletions in winter conditions represent the general situation at Dome A, this likely suggests that atmosphere–snow water vapor exchange tends to increase snow isotope seasonality, and the annual net effect would be overall enrichments in snow isotopes since the effects in summer appear to be greater than those in winter. This trend will need to be further explored in the future with more comprehensive model studies and/or field observations and experiments.
Ma et al. (Wed,) studied this question.