Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Mid‐upper arm circumference (MUAC) is a simple anthropometric tool used to screen for childhood undernutrition in humanitarian settings or low‐income and middle‐income countries. However, there is conflicting evidence and a lack of consensus with regard to its diagnostic use in clinical settings or population groups beyond this context. In 2023, a project officer was appointed by the Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (AuSPEN) to lead the development of a consensus review into the use of MUAC in the pediatric clinical setting. Methods An AuSPEN appointed multidisciplinary group of informed clinicians used the Delphi method to critically appraise the evidence and develop a series of consensus statements. Delphi surveys were anonymous and distributed electronically. Members were asked to rate their level of agreement with each consensus statement using a 5‐point Likert scale. A priori definition of consensus was established as ≥80% responses “agree” or “strongly agree.” Results Three Delphi rounds were required to reach consensus. A total of 18 consensus statements, including rationale, were developed across the topics ‘assessment and diagnosis’, ‘screening and monitoring’ and ‘clinical settings’. Conclusion An evidence‐based, region‐specific consensus approach to the use of MUAC in pediatric malnutrition is a valuable tool for clinicians. MUAC is a straightforward, non‐invasive and cost‐effective tool, and may provide an advantage over traditional anthropometric tools in some clinical settings. There are limitations to the utility of MUAC and this consensus paper provides an empirical summary of advantages and limitations as they apply to the screening, assessment, diagnosis, and monitoring of pediatric malnutrition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miles et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: