This study proposes novel and modified conventional flow fields for a high-temperature PEM fuel cell, and predicts the fluid dynamic behavior with a 3D, computational fluid dynamics model. Five base flow field patterns (FFPs) are selected: a 4-channel serpentine, a hybrid design, a 2-channel spiral, a dual-triangle sandwich, and a parallel pin-type flow field. For each base FFP, sub-patterns are developed through modification of the channels and ribs. The 4-channel serpentine is taken as the state-of-the-art reference flow field. Simulations are carried out at two different mass flow rates. The result shows that the incorporation of a dead end in flow channels or the merging of channels into a single channel before connecting to the outlet enhances the average and maximum GDL mass flux, but it also increases the pressure drop. The parallel pin-type design-3 and dual-triangle sandwich design-1 exhibit a more even distribution but yield a lower average GDL mass flux than the 4-channel serpentine, which could be beneficial for reducing MEA degradation and thus used at low load conditions where a high mass flux is not needed. In contrast, the uniform hybrid design and 2-channel spiral design-2 provide a higher average and maximum mass flux with a more non-uniform distribution and greater pressure drop. The high average GDL mass flux would be beneficial during high load conditions to ensure enough reactants reach the catalyst.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chowdhury et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: