Comparative analysis reveals distinct fracture and adhesion behaviors in modified zirconium nitride coatings on titanium alloys, highlighting compositional trade-offs.
The fracture strength was compared in a scratch test of coatings based on the ZrN system with the introduction of Ti, Nb and Hf, which were deposited on a titanium alloy substrate. The coatings were deposited using Controlled Accelerated Arc (CAA-PVD) technology. In coatings that simultaneously include Zr and Ti, a nanolayer structure is formed, while in coatings without Ti, the formation of a monolithic single-layer structure is observed. The comparison was carried out according to two parameters: adhesion strength to the substrate and overall coating strength. The (Zr,Hf)N coating showed better resistance to destruction, but had worse adhesion to the substrate. As a result, although the coating is retained directly in the scribing groove, a large area of delamination and destruction is formed around the groove. The (Ti,Zr,Nb)N coating, with its somewhat lower strength, has a high adhesion to the substrate; no noticeable delamination is observed along the groove boundary. In this paper, not only is the fracture resistance of various coatings deposited on a titanium alloy substrate compared, but the nature of this fracture is also investigated depending on the composition of the coatings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Metel et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: