Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This system was developed to determine the accuracy of sentiment analysis on Twitter regarding the COVID-19 issue using the Nazief-Adriani and Porter stemmers with TF-IDF weighting, along with a classification process using K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) that resulted in a comparison of 48.24% for Nazief-Adriani and 48.24% for Porter. Purpose: This research aims to determine the accuracy of the Nazief-Adriani and Porter stemmer algorithms in performing text preprocessing using a dataset from Indonesian-language Twitter. This research involves word weighting using TF-IDF and classification using the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithm. Methods/Study design/approach: The experimentation was conducted by applying the Nazief-Adriani and Porter stemmer algorithm methods, utilizing data sourced from Twitter related to COVID-19. Subsequently, the data underwent text preprocessing, stemming, TF-IDF weighting, accuracy testing of training and testing data using K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithm, and the accuracy of both stemmers was calculated employing a confusion matrix table. Result/Findings: This study obtained reasonably accurate results in testing the Nazief-Adriani stemmer with an accuracy of 50.98%, applied to sentiment analysis of COVID-19-related Twitter data using the Indonesian language. As for the accuracy of the Porter stemmer, it achieved an accuracy rate of 48.24%. Novelty/Originality/Value: Feature selection is crucial in stemmer accuracy testing. Therefore, in this study, feature selection is carried out using the Nazief-Adriani and Porter stemmers for testing purposes, and the accuracy data classification is conducted using the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithm
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fikri et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: