Background: Conventional approaches for diabetes type-2 management generally fail to consider genetic and environmental variations for each patient. But new developments in personalized medicine and genetics are changing our understanding and approaches for type-2 treatment. Objective: To explore the effectiveness of a personalized medicine and genomic based interventions for glycemic level, medication compliance and complications in patients with diabetes type-2 compared to usual care. Methodology: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) study was performed on total n=400 patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups; the intervention group was treated according to genomic profile while the control group was treated in a routine manner. Glycemic control (HbA1c), treatment compliance, and the rate of complications during September 2023 till June 2024 were considered as primary indicators. An independent sample t-test and a chi-square test were used to analyse the results with the help of the SPSS version 27.0. p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Those patients who were given individualized management had improved mean HbA1c level by 1 percent as compared to the initial level. 2% compared to 0.6% in the standard care group(p<0.01). Patients in the personalized care group had an 85% compliance to recommended treatment as opposed to the standard care group with only 65% (p<0.001). Also, the number of complications was much fewer in the personalized care group (10%) as compared to the standard care group (20%); (p= 0.02). Conclusion: Personalized medicine and genomics-based interventions offer substantial benefits in the management of Type 2 diabetes, leading to better blood sugar control, higher treatment adherence, and fewer complications. These findings suggest that integrating genomics into diabetes care could improve health outcomes for patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javed et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: