Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Object: The purpose of the study is a comparative analysis of the processes of urbanization development in Kazakhstan and in Russia, covering the chronological framework of almost a century period. Methods: concretization and abstraction; retrospective analysis and classification; comparative analysis; descrip tive method; statistical methods and methods of scientific analysis and synthesis. conclusions: - The special demographic structure of the 1980s was reinforced by the economic restructuring of the 1990s and gave rise to probably the most important problem of the 21st century in Russia and the countries of the former USSR: demographic decline and urban population decline. - At present, the development of former socialist cities is largely determined by market forces and democratically elected governments. However, they are also not fully developed capitalist cities. - The main similarity between the urbanization of Russia and Kazakhstan is the gap between the most developed major cities of federal and republican significance and lagging medium and small cities. - In Russia and Kazakhstan, medium and small towns are often characterized by specialized and less diversified economies. Conclusions: The development of medium-sized and small cities in Russia and Kazakhstan faces the main problems: lack of financing and/or inefficient use; barriers to decentralization; insufficiently effective regulatory framework and lack of standards or their ineffective implementation regarding sustainable and environmentally friendly develop ment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akhmetova et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: