Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A bstract We extend our consideration of commutative subalgebras (rays) in different representations of the W 1+ ∞ algebra to the elliptic Hall algebra (or, equivalently, to the Ding-Iohara-Miki (DIM) algebra Uq,t(gl̂₁) U q , t gl ̂ ̂ 1 ). Its advantage is that it possesses the Miki automorphism, which makes all commutative rays equivalent. Integrable systems associated with these rays become finite-difference and, apart from the trigonometric Ruijsenaars system not too much familiar. We concentrate on the simplest many-body and Fock representations, and derive explicit formulas for all generators of the elliptic Hall algebra e n , m . In the one-body representation, they differ just by normalization from zⁿqmD̂ z n q m D ̂ of the W 1+ ∞ Lie algebra, and, in the N -body case, they are non-trivially generalized to monomials of the Cherednik operators with action restricted to symmetric polynomials. In the Fock representation, the resulting operators are expressed through auxiliary polynomials of n variables, which define weights in the residues formulas. We also discuss q , t -deformation of matrix models associated with constructed commutative subalgebras.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Миронов et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: