This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND Technology-assisted sexual abuse (TASA) mostly involves the production and non-consensual sharing of sexual images; however, evidence-based support for young people (YP) who have experienced TASA is scant. Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) have the potential to increase access to support and provide timely therapeutic input in a familiar format to YP. However, studies describing engagement with DHIs is nascent. OBJECTIVE To describe engagement patterns for young people who used the i-Minds app. METHODS The i-Minds app is a co-designed mentalisation-based DHI for YP who have experienced TASA. Usage data was collected during the 6-week intervention window using Matomo analytics software and analysed according to the AMUsED framework. RESULTS Forty-one participants were onboarded to the app. Of these, 95% completed the introductory mandatory module, and nearly half completed the remaining three modules. Median duration of app engagement was 33 days. Most participants used the app on weekdays in the afternoon. Demographic variables, namely gender not matching with sex assigned at birth/prefer not to disclose and higher baseline clinical severity were associated with higher app engagement. CONCLUSIONS Participants showed high module completeness and engagement duration, suggesting the potential for real-world use. Potential participant-level predictors of engagement, such as gender identity and severity of TASA related traumatic stress and emotional distress, were identified. Achieving satisfactory engagement in DHIs is challenging yet necessary for delivering effective interventions. Future studies should explore participant-level predictors of engagement to inform real-world use of DHIs with a diverse sample. CLINICALTRIAL International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry (ISRCTN) ISRCTN43130832; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN43130832 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.2196/40539
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bucci et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: