Ecological approaches to language are typically framed in negative terms, i.e. as arejection of existing symbolic approaches. I here sketch the outlines of a positiveformulation for ecological linguistics. According to this positive formulation, languageis built on a pre-existing foundation of spatial reasoning. I illustrate this through casesfrom comparative, developmental, and cultural-historical psychology. I discuss how theecological formulation leads to a different set of research questions from those that arefamiliar from Chomskyan linguistics. I end by discussing some lessons and futurepriorities for an ecological linguistics research program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edward Baggs (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: