Recent research suggests that caregivers’ speech in response to their infants’ attentional shifts (‘follow-in speech’) is correlated with vocabulary size. It is not yet clear, however, what possible developmental pathways underlie this correlation. One possibility is that follow-in speech, and follow-in naming in particular, directly contributes to infants’ vocabulary by providing names of objects in infants’ focus. Another possibility is that follow-in speech contributes to vocabulary growth via sustained attention, extending infants’ looking to a specific object of interest and enhancing the encoding of the word-object mapping. Yet another way in which follow-in speech can contribute to vocabulary growth is by elevating infants’ attention to the object and further speech. Our analyses suggest that follow-in speech likely contributes to infants’ vocabulary in the first year via two pathways: directly, by providing the names of objects in infants’ focus and indirectly, via influencing infants’ attention. We also show that the effects of follow-in speech are distinct from the contribution of parents’ verbal responses to infants’ other communicative bids, such as vocalizing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luchkina et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: