Background: Background: Proximal humerus fractures account for approximately 4% of all fractures and 26% of humeral fractures. While conservative treatment is often recommended, surgical management remains debated, particularly with the use of percutaneous pinning and PHILOS plating.Objective: To compare the functional outcomes of proximal humerus fractures managed with percutaneous pinning versus PHILOS plating using Constant and Murley’s score.Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Services Hospital, Lahore, over 18 months. A total of 128 patients were randomized into two groups: Group A (Percutaneous Pinning, n=64) and Group B (PHILOS Plating, n=64). Demographic data were recorded, and functional outcomes were assessed using Constant and Murley’s score at the 24th week. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 25, with independent t-tests and chi-square tests applied, considering p<0.05 significant.Results: The mean Constant and Murley score were 84.58 ± 8.561 in Group A and 86.48 ± 7.622 in Group B (p=0.186). Favorable outcomes were seen in 34.4% (n=44) in Group A and 42.2% (n=54) in Group B (p=0.037).Conclusion: PHILOS plating proved a higher rate of favorable outcomes compared to percutaneous pinning, suggesting its preferable use for proximal humerus fracture management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wasim et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: