Key result
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation improves functional capacity, increasing 6MWT distance by ~36 meters over usual care.
Why the study?
Postoperative recovery after CABG is often associated with reduced functional capacity and quality of life, and participation in traditional center-based cardiac rehabilitation is limited by logistical barriers.
Does a structured home-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve functional capacity in patients recovering from CABG surgery?
RCT (n=26)
Single-blind
Computer-generated random allocation sequence
No
Does a structured home-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve functional capacity in patients recovering from CABG surgery?
Mean Difference: 35.6 (95% CI 26.8–44.4)
Absolute Event Rate: 76.4% vs 40.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
A 12-week tele-guided home-based cardiac rehabilitation program significantly improved functional capacity, LVEF, and quality of life in post-CABG patients compared to usual postoperative care.
Supports home-based cardiac rehabilitation after CABG; extends RCT evidence for tele-guided programs in this population.
Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is frequently performed for advanced coronary artery disease; however, postoperative recovery is often associated with reduced functional capacity and impaired quality of life. Cardiac rehabilitation programs play an essential role in recovery, yet participation in traditional center-based programs remains limited due to logistical and accessibility barriers. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) program in improving functional capacity, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and quality of life among patients recovering from CABG surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Arif Memorial Hospital, Lahore, including 26 patients who had undergone CABG surgery. Participants were randomly assigned to either a home-based cardiac rehabilitation group (n = 13) or a control group receiving usual postoperative care (n = 13). The HBCR program consisted of a 12-week structured exercise and education protocol with remote follow-up. Functional capacity was assessed using the six-minute walk test (6MWT), cardiac function was measured through echocardiographic LVEF, and quality of life was evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25. Results: The HBCR group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in functional capacity compared with controls (mean increase 76.4 m vs. 40.8 m; p < 0.001). LVEF increased by 6.3% in the HBCR group compared with 3.2% in the control group (p = 0.001). Quality-of-life scores improved significantly more in the HBCR group (mean increase 24.8 vs. 13.9 points; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Home-based cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved functional capacity, cardiac function, and quality of life in post-CABG patients, supporting its potential role as an accessible alternative to traditional rehabilitation programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Younas et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease post-CABG (n=26). Structured home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) vs. Usual postoperative care was evaluated on Change in functional capacity measured by the six-minute walk test (6MWT) distance from baseline to 12 weeks (Mean difference 35.6 m, 95% CI 26.8 to 44.4, p=<0.001). A 12-week structured home-based cardiac rehabilitation program significantly improved functional capacity compared to usual care, increasing six-minute walk distance by a mean difference of 35.6 meters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: