Key result
Aerobic cardiac rehab improves 10-week walking distance by ~61 m post-CABG vs usual care.
Why the study?
Locally generated evidence on outpatient physiotherapy-based Phase-II cardiac rehabilitation after CABG in Pakistan remained limited.
Does a structured aerobic exercise cardiac rehabilitation program improve functional capacity and quality of life compared to usual cardiac rehabilitation in clinically stable post-CABG patients with LVEF 35%-44%?
RCT (n=30)
Two-arm randomized (1:1 allocation)
Does a structured aerobic exercise cardiac rehabilitation program improve functional capacity and quality of life compared to usual cardiac rehabilitation in clinically stable post-CABG patients with LVEF 35%-44%?
Supervised moderate-intensity Phase-II aerobic exercise rehabilitation significantly improves 10-week functional walk distance and quality of life compared with usual rehabilitation in post-CABG patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports structured aerobic rehabilitation post-CABG in LVEF 35-44%; extends evidence to this subgroup.
Background: Cardiac rehabilitation usually incorporates exercises as central to recovery after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, locally generated evidence from outpatient physiotherapy based Phase-II cardiac rehabilitation services in Pakistan remains limited.Objective: To determine whether a structured aerobic exercise cardiac rehabilitation program improves functional capacity and quality of life compared to usual cardiac rehabilitation in clinically stable post-CABG patients.Methodology: This study was a two arm randomized controlled trial enrolling 30 participants aged 40-75 years with left ventricular ejection fraction of 35%-44%. Participants were randomized to aerobic exercise training group (n=15) or usual care group (n=15). The intervention was delivered three times per week and comprised of warm-up, progressive aerobic training at 40%-60% of heart rate reserve as well as Borg rating of perceived exertion 11-14 and cool-down with symptom and haemodynamic monitoring. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and end of week 10. Primary analysis used ANCOVA for post intervention adjusted for baseline 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) for functional capacity and SF-36 for quality of life.Results: Baseline 6MWT distance was similar between groups. At the end of week 10, the adjusted between-group difference favored aerobic training by 61.14 m (95% CI 51.60-70.68; p<0.001; partial η²=0.865). SF-36 domain scores also favored aerobic training across all domains, and all domain level comparisons survived Holm-Bonferroni correction with partial η² range 0.339–0.592.Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that a moderate intensity, physiotherapist supervised aerobic exercise program may improve functional capacity and quality of life after CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhammad Riaz Baig Chughtai (2026) conducted an RCT in Clinically stable post-CABG with LVEF 35%-44% (n=30). Structured aerobic exercise cardiac rehabilitation program vs. Usual care (usual cardiac rehabilitation) was evaluated on 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distance for functional capacity and SF-36 for quality of life at week 10 (MD 61.14 m, 95% CI 51.60-70.68, p=<0.001). Aerobic exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improved 10-week walking distance by 61.14 m vs usual care after CABG.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: