Previous meta-analysis indicated that plasma or serum proteome groups using various experimental conditions detected different peptides from the same plasma proteins, which is strong evidence for the veracity of blood fluid LC-ESI-MS/MS but also evidences that the trypsin digestion step is a key source of variation in plasma proteomics. Agreement between different digestion conditions and MS/MS algorithms may serve as an independent confirmation of the validity of the LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of plasma peptides. Plasma contains a high percentage of albumin held together by multiple disulfide bonds; hence, reduction and/or alkylation may greatly enhance the digestion efficiency of albumin. Plasma proteins were precipitated in 90% acetonitrile, collected over quaternary amine resin, and eluted in NaCl prior to digestion treatments. To determine the effect of trypsin digestion methods, the plasma proteins were digested in 600 mM urea and 5% acetonitrile with trypsin alone, or reduced with 2 mM DTT followed by trypsin, or DTT followed by 15 mM iodoacetamide and then trypsin. The resulting peptides were analyzed by LC-ESI-MS/MS with a linear quadrupole ion trap (LIT). The MS/MS spectra were directly fit to peptides by the X!TANDEM and SEQUEST algorithms. Blank noise injections served as the analytical control, and 30 million random MS/MS served as the statistical control. Digesting human plasma with DTT reduction, or reduction and alkylation, resulted in a dramatic increase in the number and observation frequency of albumin peptides. In contrast, digestion with trypsin alone suppressed the observation of albumin, and instead, many low abundance plasma and cellular proteins showed higher observation frequency. Digestion with trypsin alone increased the observation frequency of APOC1, ACAN, ATRN, CPB2, GP2, GPX3, HBA1, PAPD5, PKD1, and many cellular proteins. After correction against noise and random controls, SEQUEST showed good agreement with the true positive plasma proteins identified by X!TANDEM and resulted in an
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: