Adipose tissue engineering (ATE) has been gaining increasing interest over the past decades, offering promise for new and innovative breast reconstructive strategies. Animal-derived gelatin- methacryloyl has already been applied in a plethora of TE strategies. However, due to clinical concerns, related to the potential occurrence of immunoglobulin (IgE)-mediated immune responses and pathogen transmission, a shift towards defined, reproducible recombinant proteins has occurred. In the present study, a recombinant protein based on human collagen type I, enriched with arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) was functionalized with photo-crosslinkable methacryloyl moieties (RCPhC1-MA), processed into 3D scaffolds and compared with frequently applied gelatin-methacryloyl (Gel-MA) from animal origin using an indirect printing method applying poly-lactic acid (PLA) as sacrificial mould. For both materials, similar gel fractions (> 65 %) and biodegradation times were obtained. In addition, a significantly lower mass swelling ratio (17.6 ± 1.5 versus 24.3 ± 1.4) and mechanical strength (Young's modulus: 1.1 ± 0.2 kPa versus 1.9 ± 0.3 kPa) were observed for RCPhC1-MA compared to Gel-MA scaffolds. In vitro seeding assays showed similar cell viabilities (> 80 %) and a higher initial cell attachment for the RCPhC1-MA scaffolds. Moreover, the seeded adipose-derived stem cells could be differentiated into the adipogenic lineage for both Gel-MA and RCPhC1-MA scaffolds, showing a trend towards superior differentiation for the RCPhC1-MA scaffolds based on the triglyceride and Bodipy assay. RCPhC1-MA scaffolds could result in a transition towards the exploitation of non-animal-derived biomaterials for ATE, omitting any regulatory concerns related to the use of animal derived products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Damme et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: