Abstract Purpose The training of clinical psychologists is conducted by clinicians, academics, trainees, service users and carers. Often those working in clinical psychology do so due to their own lived experiences. These stakeholders may require navigating both personal and professional identities in their roles. This study aimed to understand identities within UK clinical psychology training. MethodFocus groups were used to socially construct and measure identity constructions of groups in clinical psychology training. A social constructionist lens was used to thematically analyse data. FindingsFour themes were found across groups. Theme 1 identified ‘dynamics of identity’ where personal and professional identities were ‘integrated,’ ‘separated,’ ‘permeable,’ or ‘visible/invisible.’ Theme 2 found the ‘impact of language and labels to rebalance power’, encompassing, ‘expectations and invalidation of a label,’ ‘weight of a label,’ and motivations to ‘rebalance the power.’ Theme 3 constructed ‘learner’ and ‘expert’ identities for each group and Theme 4 found ‘Bridging Them & Us divisions’ by identifying, ‘Feeling Similar and Different,’ and ‘Barriers and Connections.’ Implications and Conclusions This is the first study to use focus groups to socially construct and measure identities in clinical psychology training. The research gives clarity to identities within clinical psychology training and can help bridge Them & Us divisions, promoting effective collaboration across the workforce.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: