Background: The lactate/pyruvate (LP) ratio has been studied as an alternative to serum lactate to determine clinical prognosis. Despite its clinical utility, there is a paucity of evidence evaluating the role of the L/P ratio in patients with sepsis. Methods: We assessed the clinical utility of the L/P ratio in patients with sepsis. The L/P ratio was measured at baseline, 4 and 8 h after admission. Our primary outcome was to determine the prognostic utility of the L/P ratio on the 15-day mortality risk. Our secondary outcomes were to compare the L/P ratio across time and its prognostic utility against standard risk calculators such as APACHE-II and SOFA scores. Results: We had a total of 80 patients, with 18 (22.5%) survivors and 62 (77.5%) non-survivors. While we found that patients having higher L/P ratios at 8 h had an increased 30-mortality risk (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02–1.18), the model’s performance showed no difference when compared to other measurements of the L/P ratio that showed no association with mortality (p-value: 0.45). For our secondary outcome, we found that the APACHE-II and SOFA scores have better performance and predictability than the L/P ratio (AUC 0.83 and AUC 0.80, respectively), but showed no association with mortality (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01–1.17 and OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02–1.18). Conclusions: Based on our findings, the L/P ratio appears to function more effectively as an early predictor of mortality when used as an adjuvant biomarker with other clinical parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cantú‐Rodríguez et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: